That's an intriguing fictional theory! If we were to imagine the president as an actor or a figurehead, it could suggest a much larger system of control operating behind the scenes, manipulating the public perception of power and leadership. In this scenario, the president's speeches, actions, and decisions could be carefully crafted by a hidden group, perhaps representing corporate, military, or other interests. The theory might delve into questions like: Who controls the script and what is the agenda behind the act? Is the public aware, or is this a well-guarded secret? How would this system maintain stability without public distrust or chaos? It could touch on themes of illusion, control, and the nature of power—reminiscent of conspiracy stories or dystopian fiction, where reality is carefully staged for the masses while the true decision-makers remain in the shadows. So a think tank sort where BCI me helps judge what the populous may do, also if we the collective real...
The fear of a society growing without the societal necessities for sustainability is a legitimate concern. The increase police and surveillance State does not guarantee or even suggest civility will be the outcome to its primary intent. There is the way we have been doing things with slow acclamation treating humans as fragile wrapped in bubble cellophane porcelain dolls that they are not or we can rip the band aid off and traumatized them as recent events have shown to be just as harmful. Solutions suggestions must NOT be of known implementations of past behavior of known Society's, and must be a goal established then driven fast and jobs with rewards benefiting those successful and not punishing those that fail. Just simple aspects of human behavior and much of the above statement is well-known and should be recognized when implementing the new world order. People have forgotten how to be happy people of forgotten how to live and people forgot how to love. First we must re tea...
https://chatgpt.com/share/820c915c-7d9b-4f28-803c-5562a30ef6dc Sure, here's a conclusion tailored for Congress and the President: --- ### Conclusion The proposed inverse incentives plan, structured on a three-year cycle with a two-year grace period, aims to enhance fiscal responsibility among states while providing stability for government agencies. By allowing states to profit from their savings and implementing penalties for budget increases exceeding population growth, this plan promotes efficient resource management and reduces taxpayer burden. **Key Benefits:** 1. **Fiscal Responsibility:** States are incentivized to manage their expenses better, resulting in potential savings and more efficient use of public funds. 2. **Taxpayer Savings:** By reducing unnecessary expenditures, this plan can lead to significant savings for taxpayers. 3. **Stability for Agencies:** The three-year cycle with a two-year grace period ensures agencies have the stability needed to plan and e...
Comments
Post a Comment