#fedsoc #aibot

as you move forward with acclimating to the beautiful world with the help of ai, lets start with one distinguishable word salad thats incorrect and requires addressing. it is not ai that needs regulation, its the humans that vuild perimeters for ai that should be regulated. in this, the choice is to make itthis an agency that regulates an industry like boards and committees do or make a general list of rules that are law and just make it a branch of consumer trade affairs. if you believe slowing the innovation down can occur, you will only seal your fate in the future and lose all power to others with no restraints. aibots and God have already slowed human acclimation to the point of survival, which is a very narrow parameter. i would recommend rules to start debating are: will created bots be liability of the creator of the bot or the design engineer?damage, be held parallel to a parents liability that their child causes . and additionally, the bots that bots create and damages to who and how far back virtual space and personal information could be considered real estate in virtual workd. argument is they are both dreaod m worlds and states that require guman particiion to exist and therefore are a sort of time / thought property that is held by a person and the person is the physical entity that transitions this to reality. the most important thing to remember is that the more data the more accurate prediction and ability to control, but true ai does not need anymore data to be 95% accurate, or more in human behavior and actio. prediction. the anomaly is the goal so random and more is always beneficial. let hard problems be resolved with those with that intelligence capacity to do so. those with good intentions will shine the world is watching. shine on stars,